<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faux-retrosexual Backlash: Letter To &#8216;business Week&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/</link>
	<description>The &#039;Father&#039; of the Metrosexual, the Retrosexual &#38; Spawner of Sporno</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The death of the retrosexual &#124; Mark Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>The death of the retrosexual &#124; Mark Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>[...] all been mediated and accessorised - and turned into another way of making men even more self-conscious and consumerist.Â  Retrosexuals are nowÂ just the latest, faddiestÂ version of metrosexuals - metrosexuals with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all been mediated and accessorised &#8211; and turned into another way of making men even more self-conscious and consumerist.Â  Retrosexuals are nowÂ just the latest, faddiestÂ version of metrosexuals &#8211; metrosexuals with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch Perspective &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Metrosexual response and other updates</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch Perspective &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Metrosexual response and other updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 21:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/08/31/faux-retrosexual-backlash-letter-to-business-week/#comment-86</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Simpson has a different take on last weekâ€™s Business Week article about the metrosexual. And as usual, he makes some excellent points. I said before, I was particularly content with the sentence â€œOh yes, and he acquired the feminine persona weâ€™ve become familiar with,â€? as I understand that he acquired this persona because of marketers such as Marian Salzman. Other readers might not have gotten the same point. Mark justly points out that â€œmetrosexuality is only â€˜feminineâ€™ if you believe vanityâ€™s name is (forever) Woman.â€? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
