Bashing Bond’s Blond Bollocks

daniel craig Bashing Bonds Blond Bollocks

I finally saw the new Bond film star­ring the new Bond Daniel Craig last night (my OUT essay was writ­ten sight unseen — wing­ing it entirely by the seat of Craig’s pants).

The new Bond deliv­ered.  Some (swoon­ingly sub­jec­tive) observations:

Bond is now the ‘Bond Girl’ of the open­ing cred­its. It’s his sil­hou­ette we see – and nary a danc­ing naked babe in sight.

Per­haps to com­pen­sate for this, in the actual film he gets his tits out a lot.

He emerges from the sea glis­ten­ing, show­ing off his pumped boobs, like Ursula Andress in ‘Dr No’ — save his nip­ples are more prominent.

Per­haps because of all that time he’s spent in the gym with his circuit-party per­sonal fit­ness trainer he has a nar­cis­sis­tic self-sufficiency and isn’t very inter­ested in shag­ging birds for shagging’s sake. He uses his body like a female spy: as bait. Lur­ing, teas­ing, seduc­ing his female tar­gets and fish­ing for infor­ma­tion just as they’re eagerly slid­ing their tongues down his six pack. Unlike pre­vi­ous Bonds, he doesn’t even have the cour­tesy to shag the girl after he’s extracted the infor­ma­tion about the man he’s after.

For the first time it’s entirely pos­si­ble to imag­ine Bond sleep­ing with a man – espe­cially if it meant he would get some­thing he wanted. Not least because Craig’s Bond is clearly MI6’s rent boy.

Speak­ing of which: The main sex scene in the film, and cer­tainly the most explicit, fea­tures Craig being tor­tured in the buff in a rusty dun­geon (or is it a back room in a gay leather bar?) by the evil Mr Big who pauses to com­pli­ment him on his physique. Craig sits strapped bol­lock naked in a rim chair while his (unseen but vividly imag­ined) blond bol­locks are bashed with a big ugly heavy knot­ted rope. Although in agony, he appears to actu­ally enjoy the expe­ri­ence and eggs his tor­turer on: ‘To the right a bit!’ When the rope thwacks his gonads even harder and repeat­edly he yells: ‘YESSSSSSSSSSS!’. All in all, he comes across as a clas­sic Pushy Con­trol­ling Bottom.

His masochism is of a piece with his nar­cis­sism and his sex-object sta­tus. Accord­ing to Dr Freud, to invite the gaze, as Bond does in this film over and over again, like a tart in the last shop­ping week before Christ­mas, is pas­sive and there­fore masochis­tic. Craig’s Bond may oscil­late between thug­gish sadism and kinky masochism, but our voyeuris­tic, sadis­tic enjoy­ment of his phys­i­cal and ulti­mately emo­tional suf­fer­ing (he falls in love) is a con­stant. We keep bash­ing his bol­locks with a big knot­ted rope, long after he’s told us what we wanted to hear. Or, if our name is Judi Dench, we sim­ply keep pulling his OHMSS string.

The film makes sev­eral other explicit state­ments about Bond’s posi­tion in the new (metro)sexual order of things. In one scene he gives his pretty female side­kick (Ves­per Green) a dress and tells her, over her protests that she has already cho­sen one: ‘I want you to look fab­u­lous’. She gives him a din­ner jacket, over his protests that he has brought his own, say­ing she wants him to look like some­one she would have on her arm. Bond looks pouty but does as he’s told. He’s clearly intrigued by the idea of a woman who might boss him about and dress him up.

His pushy con­trol­ling bot­tom is at the fore­front of her mind when they first meet. ‘I will keep my eye on our Government’s money and off your perfectly-formed arse,’ she promises, uncon­vinc­ingly. ‘You noticed then?’ says Bond, a lit­tle too eagerly.

Yes, she did. So did we, Daniel. But I think you know that.

She, of course, doesn’t quite keep her mind on the job – and we don’t keep our minds on the plot.

Which is just as well. An occa­sion­ally slightly silly film which is also rather over­long (the end­less, unin­tel­li­gi­ble card game almost makes you miss the ‘count­down to Armaged­don’ explo­sive cliche of pre­vi­ous Bond films) is redeemed partly by being as well-made as his Aston Mar­tin, but mostly by the spec­ta­cle of Mr Bond’s perfectly-formed 21st Cen­tury exhibitionism.

Bond has become his own Bond girl and is finally the sex-object of his own movies in the way that the stars of Bond knock-offs have been for years — like Tom Cruise in the Missy Impos­si­ble series. (You can be sure that flat-chested Mr Cruise has turned quite green with envy at the sight of Mr Craig’s bazookas.)

All in all, the best Bond movie in decades and the best Bond — per­haps the only Bond — since Connery.

12 Comments

  • Maybe the ‘Clas­sic Pushy Bot­toms’ and the ‘Clas­sic Pas­sive Tops’ should get together in a (very large) room and fight it out amongst them­selves. With the cam­eras rolling of course, for the rest of us to enjoy the carnage.

  • Oops, I think I may have already appeared in that movie.…

  • Clas­sic Pushy Bot­tom’ is a clas­sic phrase!

    I loved Casino Royale for all the rea­sons you men­tion. The tor­ture scene was so delight­fully done to tit­il­late, which does not hap­pen except in the hor­ror genre usually.

    Your analy­sis has made me realise why I found the het­ero ‘romance’ side of the movie so uncon­vinc­ing: it just didn’t add up in the light of all the homo-erotic imagery of the rest of the film.

    I’d be happy to watch the film again with­out the narrative;,just an edited DVD of the key scenes and Craig body shots would do me fine!

    I never watched Q O S : I knew that they wouldn’t be able to strike fauxmo gold twice in a row.

  • Wel, I’ve enough expe­ri­ence of that par­tic­u­lar species to recog­nise one when it pushes back at me — in Widescreen.

  • […] are placed in the Fed­eral Wit­ness Pro­tec­tion pro­gram after wit­ness­ing an extor­tion scheme go wrong. Kill­shot. Think­ing they are at last safe, they are tar­geted by an expe­ri­enced intim­i­dat­ing hit man and a […]

  • […] to younger view­ers by rein­car­nat­ing him in the pneu­matic form of Daniel Craig — Bond became his own big-chested Bond Girl — and last year’s smash hit film ‘300′ fea­tured ‘Spar­tans’ who looked less […]

  • […] re-booting of the James Bond fran­chise last year with Daniel Craig in the lead role was strongly influ­enced by the suc­cess of the Bourne films, which of course were them­selves an […]

  • […] Health, mois­turiser and D&G swim­ming trunks and has man­aged to grow tits big enough to become his own Bond Girl. Share This Posted in mas­culin­ity, commentary […]

  • Ever since I saw this fel­low in the movie ‘Layer Cake’, I just knew he was des­tined for Bond…puts the rest to shame, although Sean Con­nery owns the part, he’s got it all down pat…a GREAT actor, and a Brit with good teeth, imag­ine that!

  • Just got back from see­ing Casino Royale. I agree, def­i­nitely the best Bond movie in decades–one of the best ever. While Craig has a few uberfag moments (his walk was a bit ‘run­way’ in places), I’ve got to say that he actu­ally made his pre­de­ces­sors look like pussies.

    Craig’s Bond was far more phys­i­cal, vis­ceral and belie­ve­ably fal­li­ble than any Bond, really. He actu­ally takes a lot more seri­ous hits in the film, gets a lot of blood on him, and, when not strut­ting, is actu­ally a lot *more* manly and malev­o­lent than the others.

    The vio­lence was all very ‘Trans­porter,’ though not as porno­graphic. (Mark, maybe you ought to work on a word for action movie homoeroticism–think old Jean Claude Van Damme movies and the Trans­porter shirt­less oil slick fight.)

    I could have done with­out the testicle/bullwhip scene, really–a bit over the top.

    And he was the Bond girl, if you *have* to say it that way–the lead­ing lady was a for­get­table, mousy ragdoll.

    I’ve heard that Fleming’s Bond was a sadis­tic bas­tard, not as campy as the movie Bonds, and I’m guess­ing Craig is the clos­est to that yet. The whole thing made me want to get some vin­tage copies of Fleming’s old books. I’ve never read them, but I’ve been mean­ing to. One of these days…

  • Wow. Now I want to see it for all the wrong rea­sons. I prob­a­bly would have rented it even­tu­ally for the explo­sions and Bond-ness of it, because I’ve always loved Bond movies, but your dis­crip­tion of the sex (I mean, tor­ture) scene is…well…somewhat titillating.

  • […] Soon all that will be left of ‘gay sex’ will be fist­ing in Con­ti­nen­tal leather bars.  Sorry, my mistake, that’s not ‘gay’ either any more.  That’s just the lat­est Bond movie. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *