<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholijism: Rome&#8217;s Answer To Sporno?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/</link>
	<description>The &#039;Father&#039; of the Metrosexual, the Retrosexual &#38; Spawner of Sporno</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:04:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mormo Missionaries &#124; Mark Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Mormo Missionaries &#124; Mark Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>[...] while back I wrote about Catholijism, the rather queer phenomenon of hunky priests of the Church of Rome posing for a spunky Calendar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back I wrote about Catholijism, the rather queer phenomenon of hunky priests of the Church of Rome posing for a spunky Calendar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Just got &#039;Catholijism&#039;. Made me snort vodka out my nose I laghed so hard. Bravo! Brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got &#8216;Catholijism&#8217;. Made me snort vodka out my nose I laghed so hard. Bravo! Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAKrolak</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>DAKrolak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 15:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>The T-Horn Birds, yummy calendar action by which I can mark all the saints birthdays etc...next we&#039;ll have rosaries with each bead having a yummy priest photo embedded on it ~ which I can tightly wrap around my...
kneel &amp; prepare to take the body of christ,
D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T-Horn Birds, yummy calendar action by which I can mark all the saints birthdays etc&#8230;next we&#8217;ll have rosaries with each bead having a yummy priest photo embedded on it ~ which I can tightly wrap around my&#8230;<br />
kneel &amp; prepare to take the body of christ,<br />
D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Malebranche</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Malebranche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marksimpson.com/blog/2006/12/15/catholijism-romes-answer-to-sporno/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah these are great. It probably plays into that &quot;bored &amp; lonely wife + cultured &amp; fascinating but unavailable priest&quot; sexual tension that The Sopranos exploited so well in the first or second season. Some chicks love their bad boys, some chicks love their very, very, very good boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah these are great. It probably plays into that &#8220;bored &amp; lonely wife + cultured &amp; fascinating but unavailable priest&#8221; sexual tension that The Sopranos exploited so well in the first or second season. Some chicks love their bad boys, some chicks love their very, very, very good boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
