Gore Vidal Turns Off The Lights on the American Dream

vidalyoung Gore Vidal Turns Off The Lights on the American Dream

Gore Vidal inter­viewed by Mark Simpson

(Arena Hommes Plus, Sum­mer 2009)

I’m hav­ing trou­ble hear­ing the last liv­ing Great Amer­i­can Man of Let­ters. He says some­thing else I don’t hear and I ask him to repeat it. Sud­denly this 83 year old leg­end is very loud and very scary indeed: ‘ISQUIET” A EUPHEMISM FOR DEAD?!’ he thun­ders in a voice much more Bib­li­cal than his old foe the late Charl­ton Hes­ton was ever able to muster. But then, Mr Vidal is amongst other things, an Old Tes­ta­ment prophet — albeit a God­less, ‘pinko’ one with a very mis­chie­vous sense of humour.

***

I am Myra Breck­in­ridge whom no man will ever pos­sess.’ So announces the open­ing sen­tence of the 1968 sen­sa­tional best­seller ‘Myra Breck­in­ridge’ about a hilar­i­ous, dev­as­tat­ing, but always ele­gant trans­sex­ual, by the hilar­i­ous, dev­as­tat­ing, but always ele­gant Gore Vidal. Myra, a (slightly psy­chotic) devo­tee of High Hol­ly­wood, hell-bent on reveng­ing her­self on Amer­i­can machismo, con­tin­ues her manifesto:

Clad only in garter belt and one dress shield I held off the entire elite of the Tro­briand Islanders, a race who pos­sess no words for ‘why’ or ‘because. Wield­ing a stone axe, I broke the arms, the limbs, the balls of their finest war­riors, my beauty blind­ing them, as it does all men, unman­ning them in the way that King Kong was reduced to a mere simian whim­per by beau­teous Fay Wray whom I resem­ble left three-quarter pro­file if the key light is no more than five feet high dur­ing the close shot.’

From the right angle, and in the right light of hind­sight, Gore Vidal resem­bles his most famous off­spring. Clad only in his wit — and an armour-plated ego — Mr Vidal has, dur­ing his long and pro­lific career as a nov­el­ist, play­wright, screen­writer, essay­ist, (failed) politi­cian, com­men­ta­tor, movie spe­cial guest-star, (glee­ful) gad­fly, and America’s (highly unau­tho­rised) biog­ra­pher, taken on The Land of the Free’s finest lit­er­ary war­riors, who had no word for ‘why’ or ‘because’, but plenty for ‘fag­got’ and ‘pinko’. Vidal broke the balls — and out­lasted — tire­somely macho brawlers like Nor­man Mailer: he com­pared ‘The Pris­oner of Sex’ to ‘three days of men­strual flow”; later, when he was knocked to the ground by Mailer, he retorted, still on the floor: ‘Words fail Nor­man Mailer yet again’.

And also right wing bruis­ers like William F. Buck­ley Jnr., whom he famously pro­voked into threat­en­ing him and shout­ing ‘you queer!’ on live national TV in 1968. ‘RIP WFB — In Hell’ was Gore’s very Chris­t­ian obit­u­ary notice last year. (Like that other thorn in the side of Amer­ica, Cas­tro, Vidal has sur­vived almost all his foes.)

In his spare time, pierc­ing, pointed Gore has taken on the Cold War, the Amer­i­can Empire, what he calls the ‘Republican-Democrat’ Party, monothe­ism, and, even more sacred to Amer­ica (and, for that mat­ter, the UK), mono­sex­u­al­ity. He him­self has had rela­tion­ships with both men and women (and what women! He was briefly engaged to Joanne Wood­ward) and main­tains, like the incur­able blas­phe­mer he is, that ‘homo­sex­ual’ and ‘het­ero­sex­ual’ are adjec­tives not nouns, acts not iden­ti­ties. Most recently, his impres­sively unnec­es­sary punk­ing of the ven­er­a­ble, extrav­a­gantly charm­ing BBC pre­sen­ter David Dim­bleby — ‘I DON’T KNOW WHO YOU ARE!’ he barked in his best Lady Brack­nell — on live TV on Elec­tion Night has become an unlikely YouTube hit.

As he once said: ‘Style is know­ing who you are, what you want to say, and not giv­ing a damn.’ Or was that Myra? Either way, Mr Vidal is more of a man than many of his adver­saries sadly mis­took them­selves for — and, per­haps, more woman than any of them could ever hope to possess.

Maybe that’s why, twenty years ago when I was a cal­low youth, I sent Mr Vidal a fan let­ter. I also included, as you do, a top­less shot: back then, I had Hol­ly­wood tits. And who bet­ter to appre­ci­ate them than Gore Vidal, MGM’s last con­tract writer? For­tu­nately for both of us, I didn’t hear any­thing back.

I put my tits away, and took to writ­ing. But I was prob­a­bly still writ­ing fan notes to Vidal, even when I scrib­bled, as I did from time to time, nasty, Oedi­pal things about him. Re-reading ‘Myra Breck­in­ridge’ I can see that far too much of my own work is just foot­notes to this forty-year-old novel which more or less invented met­ro­sex­u­al­ity decades before the word was coined, strapped it on and rammed it where the sun don’t shine. (Described at the time on the dust-jacket as a ‘novel of far-out sex­u­al­ity’ it now seems, well, all the way in).

But now I’m actu­ally speak­ing to Mr Vidal. I feel like Michael J Fox in ‘Back to the Future’ where he meets his teen mother at High School (save my ‘mother’ is gen­er­ally agreed to be no pussy­cat). Am I going to dis­ap­pear into an embar­rass­ing time-paradox? ‘Please for­give my ner­vous­ness,’ I stut­ter. ‘I’m a Big Fan — though I sup­pose those words prob­a­bly strike ter­ror into your heart.…’

With­out miss­ing a beat comes the laconic reply, in that mea­sured, unmis­tak­able voice: ‘They clearly strike ter­ror into yours.’

Later, I hand him another line when I gush, not entirely base­lessly: ‘To some­one like me, you almost seem like the embod­i­ment of the Twen­ti­eth Century!’

On arthritic days I know I’m the Twen­ti­eth Century’.

Mr Vidal is speak­ing today from his Amer­i­can home of the last forty years in the Hol­ly­wood Hills. Vidal in the Hol­ly­wood Hills makes sense — it is an LA Eyrie; a place where his back is cov­ered and from which he can spy peo­ple com­ing a long way off. His fortress-like house in Rav­ello, Italy, which he recently sold, was perched atop rocky cliffs, reached only by a steep, dizzy­ing path­way. But Vidal says he chose the Hills because they weren’t vul­gar. ‘Unlike other parts of LA, like Bev­erly Hills or Bel Air, when I bought this house forty years ago, it did not attract the super rich, wher­ever they live they build these huge houses. You don’t have many of those up here in the hills.’

Do you sur­vey Los Ange­les from your window?’

Heav­ens, no! There’s no sight uglier than Los Angeles!’

But at night it can be very beautiful.’

Well, almost any­where can be beau­ti­ful at night.’

True. Even a refin­ery town like Mid­dles­brough, which just hap­pens to be down the road from my own some­what less glam­orous home. The open­ing aer­ial shot of a future, infer­nal Los Ange­les in ‘Blade Run­ner‘ were sup­pos­edly inspired by Mid­dles­brough at night — the direc­tor Rid­ley Scott grew up round there.’

Yes, Rid­ley Scott used to hire my house. I think also dur­ing the mak­ing of that film. I used to hire it out a lot — mostly to Brits.’

You’re regarded very fondly on these shores.’

It’s rec­i­p­ro­cated,’ he says, almost warmly. ‘The books were read in the UK at the same time as they were in Amer­ica. Although more eas­ily for the Eng­lish since, unlike the New York Times, the Lon­don Times was not ded­i­cated to attack­ing me.’

The New York Times, tak­ing lady­like fright at the matter-of-fact way Vidal’s sec­ond novel ‘The City and the Pil­lar’ dealt with same-sex love in the US Army dur­ing the Sec­ond World War (Vidal enlisted at the age 17), had an attack of the vapours and banned Gore’s next five nov­els. No minor snub this, since the NYT even more so then than today could make or break you as a writer.

Per­haps the NYT was so shocked because this dis­taste­ful dis­si­dent was a prod­uct of the very heart of the East Coast Elite. A cuckoo in a feath­ered nest. Born in Octo­ber 3, 1924 at the US Mil­i­tary Acad­emy in West­point, his father an aero­nau­tics pio­neer and air­line tycoon (found­ing what would become TWA and East­ern Air­lines), his grand­fa­ther was Thomas P. Gore, the most pow­er­ful Sen­a­tor of the age — and also blind — his mother was an actress and socialite (and a mean drunk). He was chris­tened Eugene Luther Vidal Jr. by the head­mas­ter of St. Albans prepara­tory school, a school for the DC elite which he was to attend. He later took the name ‘Gore’ in hon­our of his grand­fa­ther (a lead­ing Iso­la­tion­ist — whose out­look Vidal has remained faith­ful to), whom he spent much of his child­hood read­ing to, and mix­ing with the most pow­er­ful fig­ures in the most pow­er­ful coun­try in the world — just before it was about to become the world.

I’d like to think that Vidal was almost a kind of inter­nal émigré from the East Coast when he arrived in LA in the early 50s as a scriptwriter for MGM. ‘Not really,’ he demurs, ‘I was back and forth between the East and West Coast. I was one of the founders of live drama on tele­vi­sion. I must have done a hun­dred plays dur­ing ’54 to ’57. After the New York Times banned me I had to make a liv­ing, and there it was: I never wanted to be a play­wright but I found out I was one. The­atre work kept me going for many years.’

A num­ber of his plays were made into movies, includ­ing ‘The Best Man’ (1960), star­ring Henry Fonda as an ide­al­is­tic Pres­i­den­tial Can­di­date faced with one who will do any­thing to win. It includes a prophetic speech: ‘One day there will be a Jew­ish Pres­i­dent and then a black Pres­i­dent. And when all the minori­ties are heard from we’ll do some­thing for the down­trod­den major­ity of this coun­try: the ladies.’ I men­tion to Vidal it’s being re-released on DVD.

Oh, they never tell me,’ he sighs, ‘and I never receive any money from it — it just hap­pens. I mean now I think the rights prob­a­bly belong to a group of Mar­t­ian busi­ness­men.’ (Pos­si­bly a bit­ter ref­er­ence to another play of his, ‘Visit to a Small Planet’, made into a movie star­ring Jerry Lewis in 1960, in which a delin­quent Mar­t­ian vis­its Earth — the play’s sharp satire of the Wash­ing­ton elite and 1950s Amer­i­can val­ues dis­ap­peared in the film version.)

It’s a busy Oscar Week­end in LA, but will Mr Vidal be attend­ing any of the events? ‘I’ve been invited to the Van­ity Fair Oscar Party but I don’t think I’ll be going along. I haven’t been to the Oscars for years. I really don’t have much inter­est any more.’

What­ever hap­pened’, I ask, ‘to the uplift­ing pro­pa­ganda for the Amer­i­can Way of Life that Hol­ly­wood used to produce?

Well, there are no longer stu­dios to gen­er­ate that kind of eupho­ria,’ he replies glumly. ‘Money is all pow­er­ful these days, and calls all the shots — in Hol­ly­wood and pretty much every­thing else in Amer­i­can life. We watched ‘That Hamil­ton Woman’ last night, as it was called in Amer­ica, the 1941 Lord Nel­son and Lady Hamil­ton biopic. It really was a spec­tac­u­lar movie, they cer­tainly don’t make them like that any­more. It was the first time that Vivien Leigh and Olivier had appeared together, which caused enor­mous excite­ment. Lon­don was being bombed and they were mak­ing this movie in Hol­ly­wood! With Alexan­der Korda direct­ing and pro­duc­ing. A superb roman­tic film and great act­ing. God…!’ He trails off in an unguarded reverie.

High Hol­ly­wood, the period that Vidal grew up with, vis­it­ing the movie the­atre almost daily, almost reli­giously, is one of the few things that Vidal could be accused of being sen­ti­men­tal about. In ‘Screen­ing His­tory’ (1992) he wrote: ‘It occurs to me that the only thing I ever really liked to do was go to the movies.’ In ‘Myra Breck­in­ridge’, the hero­ine declares: ‘…in the decade between 1935 and 1945, no irrel­e­vant film was made in the United States. Dur­ing those years, the entire range of human (which is to say, Amer­i­can) leg­end was put on film, and any pro­found study of those extra­or­di­nary works is bound to make crystal-clear the human condition.’

No one could accuse most Hol­ly­wood con­tem­po­rary out­put of being amenable to ‘pro­found study’. High Hol­ly­wood was about money too of course, but movies back then often seemed to be the most aes­thetic medium imag­in­able: fash­ion, art, glam­our. How was that?

The early moguls liked art,’ explains Vidal. ‘Like Adolph Zuckor who founded Para­mount. He cast Sarah Bern­hardt, the famous French actress, in Queen Eliz­a­beth, his first fea­ture film. Zuckor aspired to the high­est stan­dards of the­atre. Then of course Hol­ly­wood became very suc­cess­ful and money became all any­one was really inter­ested in.’

Remem­ber, movies are movies. It’s bet­ter to do them out here where there’s plenty of light with­out going broke over the elec­tric­ity. Mind you, the rea­son that Warner Broth­ers films were often the best movies made in the 1930s was because they looked so dark — the chiaroscuro qual­ity of WB films was price­less. Bette Davies in The Let­ter was a great one– from the open­ing gloomy, brood­ing shot. How did Warner do it? Well it was because the Broth­ers Warner were very, very cheap! They’d go around from sound­stage to sound­stage turn­ing the lights down, so halfway through the day every scene was in darkness!’

It was said that a British actor, a lit­tle on the pompous side came over here for some loot. Address­ing some of the old timer Amer­i­can actors he asked: “Isn’t it dif­fi­cult liv­ing in a soci­ety so unrooted and uprooted, with­out tra­di­tion of any kind?” One of them answered: “Why the Warner Broth­ers Christ­mas lay­offs are one of our great­est tra­di­tions!“‘ Vidal laughs scornfully.

Vidal is him­self a fre­quent vis­i­tor to the UK, ‘When I was younger I always made a point to visit Sav­ille Row When­ever in Lon­don — though the last time was 30 years ago.’

How long does a Sav­ille suit last?’

For­ever! I don’t believe in fash­ion. I have no time for it. Ver­sace once told me I looked a state and sent some of his staff to visit me in Rav­ello and make a suit. And very nice suits they were too. But it isn’t some­thing I take an inter­est in.’

Vidal may claim not to believe in fash­ion, but in ‘Myra Breck­in­ridge’ he proved a pro­found observer of male fash­ion trends, pre­dict­ing in effect the Twenty First Cen­tury: ‘…young men [today] com­pen­sate by play­ing at being men, wear­ing cow­boy clothes, boots, black leather, attempt­ing through clothes (what an age for the fetishist!) to imper­son­ate the kind of man our soci­ety claims to admire but swiftly puts down should he attempt to be any­thing more than an illu­sion­ist, play­ing a part.’

But when I sug­gest this to him, bring­ing up his most famous, most prophetic book, he just says quickly, ‘I should read it again.’ Mak­ing it quite clear that he doesn’t wish to dis­cuss it. Per­haps the eccen­tric 1970 film ver­sion star­ring Raquel Welch left a bad taste in his mouth — it cer­tainly left a bad taste in the crit­ics’ mouths.

I ask him when he was last in the UK. ‘Just the other week. I had the great joy of address­ing the House of Com­mons in Westminster’s Great Hall cour­tesy of Third World Sol­i­dar­ity to talk about the mat­ter of Cuba and the United States. It was the venom of the Kennedy broth­ers who were out to destroy Cas­tro because he didn’t want to be killed by them. Or invaded. Or taken over. And his rev­o­lu­tion erased. The van­ity of that family!’

Vidal’s vig­or­ous attacks on lib­eral icons the Kennedys — whom he knew per­son­ally — for their war­mon­ger­ing are always value for money, explod­ing as they do the soft-focus mythol­ogy of Camelot. Vidal was one of the few peo­ple in Amer­i­can pub­lic life to dare to denounce the Cold War as an Amer­i­can inven­tion to keep the polit­i­cally and eco­nom­i­cally prof­itable US war machine turn­ing over after the Sec­ond World War ceased trad­ing. ‘The thing about Jack was that he actu­ally believed all that anti-communist pro­pa­ganda — the pre­vi­ous Pres­i­dents didn’t.’ (To which could be added: George W. Bush had much in com­mon with Kennedy’s mes­sianic zeal and frothy talk of ‘free­dom’ — he just didn’t have the good for­tune to be assas­si­nated in his first term.)

Vidal was vehe­mently attacked for his out­spo­ken­ness about the Cold War and par­tic­u­larly for talk­ing and writ­ing about some­thing that was as clear as day: the Amer­i­can Empire. ‘“How dare you!” peo­ple shouted,’ recalls Vidal. ‘“We’re not an Empire! We stand for freedom!“‘

Recently pretty much every­one has started talk­ing about the “Amer­i­can Empire”,’ I observe.

Well, when we started down the Roman Impe­r­ial, dynas­tic way with the Bush fam­ily,’ says Vidal wearily, ‘it became quite clear it was all wrong what­ever it was. Remem­ber, we didn’t break away from Eng­land, we broke away from the King. That’s what the Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence is all about. Thomas Jefferson’s bril­liant pro­pa­ganda united the colonists against George III.’

We’re the orig­i­nal Evil Empire.’

Well, you cer­tainly were then.’

Alas, our empire fell …’

Well, you ran out of money.’

Yes. As the US seems to be doing now. Are you sur­prised by the speeded-up sched­ule of Impe­r­ial implosion?’

I was sur­prised by the speed at which we lost the Repub­lic, and lost Magna Carta dur­ing the Bush Dictatorship.’

But you see lib­eral icon Roo­sevelt as the first Amer­i­can Emperor — decree­ing there should be no Empires, save his.’

I’ll tell you a story. Roo­sevelt was hav­ing lunch with Churchill. The Sec­ond World War was draw­ing to a close. They toasted the end of the war. Then Roo­sevelt gave Churchill a radi­ant smile, and said [here Vidal imi­tates Roosevelt’s high Patri­cian voice: he is a great, sav­age mimic], ‘You real­ize you’re going to have to give up your pre­cious India, don’t you?’ [imi­tat­ing Churchill’s jowly tones] “Never!” And they had a quar­rel over the lunch table. Many peo­ple who hap­pened to be there spread it around. Roo­sevelt not only won the argu­ment, it was force majeure. Roo­sevelt said, ‘The days of Empire are over, and I trust you real­ize this.“‘

Churchill said: “What do you want me to do? Get on my hind legs like your lit­tle dog Fala, and beg?” Roo­sevelt said sim­ply: “Yes.” Don’t tempt an Emperor!’

Most peo­ple in the UK seem not to have realised the real nature of the ‘spe­cial rela­tion­ship’ we have had with the US since 1940.’

Why should they? their lives go on anyway…’.

Vidal is a keen his­to­rian, but that most dan­ger­ous kind: an auto­di­dact. ‘I didn’t go to Har­vard,’ he once boasted. ‘I just sent my work there.’ Unlike most his­to­ri­ans, Vidal has actu­ally had met most of the key play­ers. Or per­haps the other way around — as he has put it him­self else­where: ‘Peo­ple always say: “You got to meet every­one.” They always put that sen­tence the wrong way around. I mean, why not put it the right way, that these peo­ple got to meet me, and wanted to? Oth­er­wise it sounds like I spent my life hus­tling around try­ing to meet peo­ple: “Oh, look, there’s the gov­er­nor.“‘ Wouldn’t you want to meet Gore Vidal if you were Jack Kennedy or William Bur­roughs? Although he is an incor­ri­gi­ble name-dropper, it’s prob­a­bly because his world has been so filled with names that not to drop them would be the pre­ten­tious thing to do.

I used to know Nancy Astor,’ he says, launch­ing into a five star anec­dote sparked by our dis­cus­sion of Britain’s rather unlikely Impe­r­ial past. ‘And I asked her about her famous trip to the Soviet with Bernard Shaw. “Well, I was just lookin’ out that train win­dow” — she had a Vir­ginia accent — “I was watchin’ the whole world go by. And it was pathetic — he kept readin’ one of his own books!”

In Moscow Stalin was in charm­ing mode, embrac­ing them, one in each arm. He lis­tened to Shaw go on for a while, then pointed to a map of the world on the wall of his Krem­lin office and he asked, “How is it that this lit­tle island in the North Sea has ended up with all this??” And he pointed to all the pink on the map. ‘“Can you explain that to me Mr. Shaw?” Shaw declined to respond. And so he turned to Lady Astor. “Well, ahh think it is becaau­use it was we first who gave the world the King James Ver­sion of the Bible.” I asked her, “What did Stalin say to that?” “He didn’t say any­thin’.” On the way out, Lady Astor asked, “Mr Stalin, when you gonna stop killin’ people?”

Oh, Lady Astor,’ replied Stalin, look­ing directly at her. “The unde­sir­able classes do not kill themselves.“‘

Now,’ says Vidal, ‘that’s a nice story where everybody’s in character!’

My audi­ence with the Twen­ti­eth Cen­tury is wind­ing down. ‘Do you think,’ I ask, look­ing for sil­ver lin­ings and sunny end­ings, ‘the lat­est Emperor, Barack Obama, can res­cue the Amer­i­can Imperium?’

The US is a very racist coun­try,’ responds Vidal sor­row­fully. ‘He will prob­a­bly be assas­si­nated. Then Mar­tial Law will be declared. The con­tin­gency plans are already in place, I’m sure.’ Like the Brother’s Warner, he’s switch­ing off the lights.

Do you think the Amer­i­can Dream can be revived?’

No. There was never any­thing to it. It was always fraud­u­lent.’ Off goes another light.

LA was once the city of the future — does it still have one?’

No. It’s run out of gas.’ And another bulb dies. We’re now in dark­ness. Bette Davis had more light in that open­ing shot in ‘The Letter.’

Do you think Amer­ica can sur­vive with­out the kind of bril­liant dreams and illu­sions Hol­ly­wood used to man­u­fac­ture — or with­out an Empire on which the sun never sets?’

Of course we can,’ he retorts. ‘We’ll just get on with our lives like every­one else.’ And a lit­tle no-frills night-light comes on.

All things con­sid­ered, it was prob­a­bly for the best that I didn’t men­tion the top­less fan let­ter I’d sent all those years ago to Gore, glo­ri­ous Grinch of the Hol­ly­wood Hills.

 

Copy­right Mark Simp­son 2009

Spe­cial thanks to Steven Zee­land and D.A. Krolak

26 Comments

  • LA was once the city of the future – does it still have one?”

    No. It’s run out of gas.”

    And another bulb dies. We’re now in dark­ness. Bette Davis had more light in that open­ing shot in ‘The Letter’.

    So true. Sim­ply, the bulbs are not being replaced and we live in a time of WB elec­tric­ity con­ser­va­tion mea­sures. Metaphor­i­cally, we will be down to can­dles in the next ten years.

  • […] or rather, disses, gay mar­riage – a sub­ject I wasn’t alas able to cover when I inter­viewed him ear­lier this year for Arena Hommes Plus as the focus of that inter­view was Hol­ly­wood. When Tee­man asks ‘Has love been impor­tant to […]

  • http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article6854221.ece

    I don’t know where he gets the idea that Obama doesn’t lie, but he’s still kickin’, thank God.

  • Thanks for the link. He cer­tainly is still kick­ing. I’m half his age and don’t have a tita­nium knee or a wheel­chair but I can’t begin to kick that hard.

  • I am a straight over 60’s woman and just love the man. His writng is superb, his wit is of the high­est order. Every day I just think about him and it brings a smile to my face. He is a couragous human being and a rare bird. Oops steal­ing his term for the other great Ameer­i­can writer Ten­nessee Williams.

  • You have excel­lent taste, Fay.

  • Mark, Thanks for post­ing this entry about one of America’s finest bisex­ual his­to­ri­ans and writers.

  • Like him or not, Gore Vidal is one of the great­est Amer­i­can authors ever!

  • Delight­ful inter­view, com­pared with pre­vi­ous inter­views Mr. Vidal seems almost enchant­ing.
    I’m not very famil­iar with his his­tory but I was curi­ous about his dis­cre­tion regard­ing his own life; he cer­tainly has been more open about the life of oth­ers. Unlike Samuel R Delany (another Amer­i­can) who has not only exposed his sex life but argued socially and intel­lec­tu­ally about its legit­i­macy. Sadly, they’re both voices from the past.

  • […] Here are two piece’s that I’ve seen recently, one is an inter­view with Gore Vidal […]

  • Loved the ref­er­ence RT! Well done.

    As for Amer­i­cans, do they actu­ally have sex? I can think of quite a few who need it, with all the deli­cious degra­da­tions that sex brings… maybe that it why they find Mark’s posts so con­fronting. Fancy hav­ing to tell oth­ers they have a cock or a mang­ina and that the messi­ness of sex is to be cel­e­brated, not locked away behind closed (mar­ried) doors.

  • In Amer­ica, intrique around the sex & gen­der topic is per­sis­tently chal­leng­ing and about all the croud can han­dle. Shag­ging boys is and may for a long time be beyond their cognative/religious shock level(they get heart attacks before think­ing). Still Puri­tains remember.

  • P Coderch wrote:

    To Mark Walsh:

    It is exactly because it was so taboo and scan­dalous in the time that Vidal was a youth that his sto­ries about shag­ging boys should be so interesting…

  • Seems to methat he just had more impor­tant things to talk about thanthe old ho hum that (stangely) scan­dal­izes some peo­ple now and was in Vidals time par for the course and sure not worth spin­ning your wheels about.

  • P Coderch wrote:

    The inter­view is very inter­est­ing, but there is no dis­cus­sion of Vidal’s fero­cious appetite for boys: I read some­where that there was a time when Vidal spent over hal his monthly income as a colum­nist on expen­sive male pros­ti­tutes. Methinks Vidal is prud­ish about dis­cussing his own past…

  • Being a typ­i­cal 22 year old clue­less gay man, I had to look up Gore Vidal, as I had many times heard of the name but never had a face or voice to attribute it to.
    Well after see­ing sev­eral videos online of Mr. Vidal being inter­viewed and read­ing up on his very col­or­ful life and his writ­ings thereof, I only have one thing to say.
    I am deeply ashamed that it took me so long to know this man.
    Thank you Mark, for the much needed enlightenment.

  • I saw you put them to good use at Dinky’s place anyway

  • Did your Hol­ly­wood tits go with your Hol­ly­wood loaf?

  • Yes. They were both full of silicone.

  • Moo. Moo! MOOOOOO!

    You’re killing us all sis­ter George.

  • George must be jeal­ous of Mark’s Hol­ly­wood tits.

  • I’M jeal­ous of my Hol­ly­wood tits. I want them back.

    It’s funny though how so many of those that bang on and on about ‘homo­pho­bia’ and ‘big­ots’ and ‘haters’ are so full of sweet­ness and light themselves.

  • The photo used of Bore Vidal is almost as old as the one Mark uses of herself

  • Mark Walsh wrote:

    Thanks for the trib­ute Mark, it’s just too sad­den­ing that one of the few, and the best of Amer­i­can Gays is qui­eted. Can you even imag­ine him march­ing in a mar­riage parade–and how stu­pid and off any point that would be? Well it seems to be much of what we’re left with.
    Actu­ally I think that ol butch Teddy Roo­sevelt was the first U.S. empire builder. But Gore, an amaz­ingly astute his­to­rian, noted that since WW2, the U.S has made 30 (unprompted)incursions into other coun­tries. We have brought every self deter­mined democ­racy to it’s knees, and replaced it with a (Cor­po­rate) coop­er­a­tive dic­ta­tor­ship. Besides that he estab­lished that we had made 207 smaller scale attacks in for­eign lands. Of Course now the Amer­i­can Empire is so well estab­lished that we invent and pro­duce only 3% of our own products.

    A for­mi­da­ble his­to­rian, but more­over an amaz­ingly inven­tive mind: Myra shocked a nation of fright­ened dense gay peo­ple into think­ing about not only how real but how legit­i­mate it was to be “queer”. To invent our lives.

    How did every­one imag­ine to for­get that, lit­er­ally reverse and fight to be mediocre?

    I’m happy you got a chance to send him your pic­ture, if for no other rea­son to let him know that at least in the UK we’re not all dummies.

    Thanks.

  • Georgie-porgie pudding-and-pie
    Said Jerry Lewis made him cry
    When Mark posted about Gore Vidal
    George hated him more ‘cos Gore is fey.

  • Let us guess, com­ments will be posted by var­i­ous silly names, such as Sisu prais­ing Mark.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *