<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Final Triumph Of Metrosexuality: Men&#8217;s Tits More Popular Than Women&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/</link>
	<description>The &#039;Father&#039; of the Metrosexual, the Retrosexual &#38; Spawner of Sporno</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5481</guid>
		<description>Observe the M.H picture: side show freak or victim of photoshopist with no anatomy? That is as &quot;real&quot; as an 8 pack comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Observe the M.H picture: side show freak or victim of photoshopist with no anatomy? That is as &#8220;real&#8221; as an 8 pack comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>Where does all this leave the mythical &#039;8-pac&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where does all this leave the mythical &#8216;8-pac&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5459</guid>
		<description>I  think that staight guys will always be confused by  us talking at their asses. No wonder, that amatomical wonder  gets  so little attention in the health mags. Even when we&#039;re not talking , those fixed stares seem to be perplexing, if not utterly baffleing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  think that staight guys will always be confused by  us talking at their asses. No wonder, that amatomical wonder  gets  so little attention in the health mags. Even when we&#8217;re not talking , those fixed stares seem to be perplexing, if not utterly baffleing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great idea. We&#039;ll call it &#039;Tit Talk&#039;.

Women always complain that men talk to their tits and not to their face.  Now they&#039;re going to have to get used to men talking through their &lt;em&gt;own &lt;/em&gt;tits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great idea. We&#8217;ll call it &#8216;Tit Talk&#8217;.</p>
<p>Women always complain that men talk to their tits and not to their face.  Now they&#8217;re going to have to get used to men talking through their <em>own </em>tits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caligula</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>Caligula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>Mark, please do a men&#039;s health column about YOUR tits. It can be a sort Tit POV blog like Bob&#039;s colon from Fight Club</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, please do a men&#8217;s health column about YOUR tits. It can be a sort Tit POV blog like Bob&#8217;s colon from Fight Club</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>The mags, like consumerism itself, have an answer to the issue of why men need to buy a new edition of the mag each month to find out AGAIN how to get BIGGER ARMS!! and KILLER ABS!! - the advice on how to achieve this and the products endorsed changes from month to month. Often doing a shameless 180.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mags, like consumerism itself, have an answer to the issue of why men need to buy a new edition of the mag each month to find out AGAIN how to get BIGGER ARMS!! and KILLER ABS!! &#8211; the advice on how to achieve this and the products endorsed changes from month to month. Often doing a shameless 180.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Yes, MH covers are a form of Sci-Fi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, MH covers are a form of Sci-Fi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark S</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5444</guid>
		<description>Ah. But &lt;em&gt;you &lt;/em&gt;know.  And now so do I - but don&#039;t worry, I won&#039;t tell anyone.

I take your point that not all bodybuilding is about an appreciation or envy of the male form - still less all of it necessarily homoerotic - but I&#039;m not really sure what MH has to do with &#039;strength&#039; or &#039;virility&#039;.

MH last time I checked is all about marketing the modern male desire to be desired with all the glossy technology of consumerism and Photoshop. Those carefully selected (from thousands of wannabes) flawless male cover models - the ones that persuade men to buy the mag - are always photographed in b/w because the body make-up they&#039;re caked in is less obvious, plus it&#039;s easier to digitally enhance. 

The abs on MH covers are literally made up. Impossible. Aspirational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. But <em>you </em>know.  And now so do I &#8211; but don&#8217;t worry, I won&#8217;t tell anyone.</p>
<p>I take your point that not all bodybuilding is about an appreciation or envy of the male form &#8211; still less all of it necessarily homoerotic &#8211; but I&#8217;m not really sure what MH has to do with &#8217;strength&#8217; or &#8216;virility&#8217;.</p>
<p>MH last time I checked is all about marketing the modern male desire to be desired with all the glossy technology of consumerism and Photoshop. Those carefully selected (from thousands of wannabes) flawless male cover models &#8211; the ones that persuade men to buy the mag &#8211; are always photographed in b/w because the body make-up they&#8217;re caked in is less obvious, plus it&#8217;s easier to digitally enhance. </p>
<p>The abs on MH covers are literally made up. Impossible. Aspirational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arctic_jay</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5443</link>
		<dc:creator>arctic_jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5443</guid>
		<description>It makes absolutely no sense to say narcissism is passive and submissive.  Narcissism as a psychological force has the power to override guilt and the need for acceptance, two vulnerabilities that keep most people in line.  To some degree, self-love is necessary for people to develop as individuals and prevent themselves from being absorbed into the undifferentiated masses.

Narcissistic people, by force of their unquestioned self-affirmation, are usually able to inseminate other less self-loving types with their own value-systems which, luckily, they happen to be prime exemplars of.  This is why cult-leaders almost always exhibit Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

I would say that by and large women are a lot more narcissistic than men, but men more often are at the extreme end of the narcissistic spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes absolutely no sense to say narcissism is passive and submissive.  Narcissism as a psychological force has the power to override guilt and the need for acceptance, two vulnerabilities that keep most people in line.  To some degree, self-love is necessary for people to develop as individuals and prevent themselves from being absorbed into the undifferentiated masses.</p>
<p>Narcissistic people, by force of their unquestioned self-affirmation, are usually able to inseminate other less self-loving types with their own value-systems which, luckily, they happen to be prime exemplars of.  This is why cult-leaders almost always exhibit Narcissistic Personality Disorder.</p>
<p>I would say that by and large women are a lot more narcissistic than men, but men more often are at the extreme end of the narcissistic spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/24/the-final-triumph-of-metrosexuality-mens-tits-more-popular-than-womens/comment-page-1/#comment-5441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksimpson.com/?p=2020#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>All of that aside, I&#039;ve occasionally found some good articles in there. 

I was also in a married, suburban guy&#039;s garage doing a delivery today, and he had exercise pages posted all over his wall near his gym equipment. I&#039;m a homo, and I&#039;ll buy it every so often. But not for the photos, which usually aren&#039;t really that hot. They do have some good workouts--better than the WAY more steroid-y Muscle and Fitness. 

I have a bunch of old exercise magazines from the 1940s-1960s. I think there&#039;s more going on with men&#039;s obsession with dreaming about being muscular and godlike than mere narcissism or a secret desire to jerk off to a bunch of half naked guys. The desire to appear strong and virile is kind of the opposite of feminine/submissive narcissism. 

Real porn is so much easier to get at anyway. In fact, to prove the point, if I hit Ctrl+T and go to my bookmarks...there, I have it in a separate window right now. And no one even knows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of that aside, I&#8217;ve occasionally found some good articles in there. </p>
<p>I was also in a married, suburban guy&#8217;s garage doing a delivery today, and he had exercise pages posted all over his wall near his gym equipment. I&#8217;m a homo, and I&#8217;ll buy it every so often. But not for the photos, which usually aren&#8217;t really that hot. They do have some good workouts&#8211;better than the WAY more steroid-y Muscle and Fitness. </p>
<p>I have a bunch of old exercise magazines from the 1940s-1960s. I think there&#8217;s more going on with men&#8217;s obsession with dreaming about being muscular and godlike than mere narcissism or a secret desire to jerk off to a bunch of half naked guys. The desire to appear strong and virile is kind of the opposite of feminine/submissive narcissism. </p>
<p>Real porn is so much easier to get at anyway. In fact, to prove the point, if I hit Ctrl+T and go to my bookmarks&#8230;there, I have it in a separate window right now. And no one even knows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
