Men’s Tits, Women’s Balls & Gavin Henson’s Tarty Body

This jokey Cana­dian ad is aimed, I believe, at encour­ag­ing women to reg­u­larly check their breasts for strange lumps. Though it seems to have been side-tracked by, er, check­ing out strange lumps. Albeit perfectly-formed and waxed ones. 

For my char­ity money the blond, buffed, fashion-bearded presenter’s best asset isn’t his chest but his man-humps — which he, along with the other tarty men in the ad, kindly shoves in the cam­era dur­ing the cred­its, while disco dancing.

I sup­pose women are very grate­ful for this kind of eager self-sacrifice on the part of men, but I’m not entirely sure what the gen­tle sex is sup­posed to do with all those plucked, pushy, insa­tiable bottoms.

To be hon­est, I’m not even sure what I’d do.

Is a bevvy of men flaunt­ing tits and ass the best way to edu­cate women about look­ing after their own bod­ies? It may come as a shock, but I’m prob­a­bly not best qual­i­fied to answer that ques­tion. I would imag­ine though that this infomer­cial has been cir­cu­lated on the inter­web rather more than more con­ven­tional efforts. But then, maybe it’s being cir­cu­lated by men like me, who can’t recall the last time they exam­ined a pair of breasts that didn’t come shrink-wrapped from Sainsburys.

One thing’s indu­bitable, how­ever: this ‘inverted’ ad is more evi­dence if it were needed of the way that in the 21st cen­tury men’s tits have not just rivalled but replaced women’s as the touch­stone of ‘sexy’ in main­stream pop cul­ture, even when the audi­ence for them is other men.

Speak­ing of tits, the appar­ently end­less UK ver­sion of real­ity TV series The Bach­e­lor star­ring met­ro­sexy Welsh rug­ger bug­ger Gavin Hen­son reached its final cli­max this week on C5. Though I’ve no idea which lucky lass Gav plumped for in the end as I only made it through the first cou­ple of shows. I have a patho­log­i­cal fear of com­mit­ment. And crazy ladies with a famous, rich, orange man in their sights.

gavin henson naked huskies 01 779x1024 Mens Tits, Womens Balls & Gavin Hensons Tarty Body

Osten­si­bly a real­ity TV show in which a series of foxy women try ensnare a celebrity play­boy who will then treat them like a princess, The Bach­e­lor is, as every­one knows, quite the oppo­site — or inverse — of how it presents itself.

No mat­ter how many times they make the eli­gi­ble bach­e­lor say sin­cerely, solemnly and unblink­ingly into the cam­era, “I am look­ing for the spe­cial woman I will marry and spend the rest of my life with” we can’t help scoff­ing, loudly. Even when they say it in an adorable, slow-talking Welsh accent. We know that every­one on the show, Mr Hen­son espe­cially, have gone on telly to spend their life with you and me.

Like­wise, despite the tra­di­tional pre­tense of the ‘pretty ladies’ with their ‘stun­ning’ out­fits paraded like cat­tle in front of the ‘man of the world’, Hen­son is unques­tion­ably the show’s eye-candy. Or ‘object’ as the fem­i­nists would have it (if they could ever bring them­selves to admit that men are objec­ti­fied too — by both women and espe­cially by themselves).

Gav’s the Prince and the Princess of The Bach­e­lor. And, it has to be said, the worst actress out of a brace of very bad ones.

Pink of lip, white of eye and tooth and with a much pret­tier com­plex­ion than most of the ladies, his body, which only seems to be actu­ally clothed after sun­set — and then in tai­lored shirts and suits that adver­tise his flar­ing back, his beefy arms, his swelling chest, his volup­tuous, shelf-like arse even more — sim­ply has no com­pe­ti­tion. All must wor­ship it. And do.

It is an aston­ish­ing, cap­ti­vat­ing ‘object’ (much more so than the one in the Cana­dian ad), which Hen­son has clearly devoted thou­sands and thou­sands of inti­mate hours to nur­tur­ing, feed­ing, water­ing, sculpt­ing, shav­ing, tan­ning and mois­tur­is­ing. This, finally, is a love story we can all believe in. What’s more, unlike most male bod­ies on dis­play these days, his also has a actual func­tion. He’s a pro­fes­sional athlete.

Lit­tle won­der then that Gav and his body is the relent­less focus of the camera’s gaze. Every time he strips off the cam­era zooms in and grazes along his taut, pol­ished skin, prac­ti­cally lick­ing the Armani body lotion off him. Just as it did last  year when he appeared on the BBC’s Sat­ur­day night ‘fam­ily show’ Strictly Come Danc­ing — a real­ity vehi­cle tar­get­ing the older viewer which also objec­ti­fies men but presents it within the faux tra­di­tional ‘sex­ist’ for­mat of ball­room danc­ing where men ‘lead’ — the eye. Sports­men appear­ing on the show have to go top­less every week or go home.

henson gallery Mens Tits, Womens Balls & Gavin Hensons Tarty Body

OK, hav­ing worked myself into a frenzy talk­ing about Gav’s pneu­matic body I’ve just taken a quick peek at the final episode of The Bach­e­lor online, and it seems Gav chose as the win­ner and his ‘girl­friend’ (what­ever that actu­ally means in the con­text of real­ity TV) a female model — with a Roman nose remark­ably sim­i­lar to his. Whose first, del­i­cate, coy, halt­ing words on see­ing him clad immac­u­lately in designer black tie in Episode One,  were: “GO ON!! SHOW US YOUR MUSCLES THEN!!!”

Before doing what every­one else wants to do to Gav, and what Gav seems to want every­one to do — grab­bing his bicep and cop­ping a really good feel.

And this is the show that the Guardian recently moaned was ‘demean­ing to women’.

Like ballsy ladies, gen­der rever­sal is every­where these days. Below is a UK viral ad rais­ing aware­ness for tes­tic­u­lar can­cer, which uses the same ‘inver­sion’ as the Cana­dian breast can­cer ad, but to rather dif­fer­ent effect. Check out the lumps on her.…

Tip: DAKro­lak

10 Comments

  • […] Welsh­man and some­thing of a flamer too. Maybe Mr Birch should have taken a leaf out of fel­low Welsh­man Gavin Henson’s bach­e­lor book and con­tin­ued play­ing rugby but as a ‘preened’ rugby player. But then again, […]

  • tu quoque: “What media are you watching?”

    Very lit­tle, and prob­a­bly not the same as you. At the moment: True Blood, Mad Men and The Good Wife for TV shows.

    I admit to being totally out of it. It’s why I find your vehe­mence inter­est­ing. I may not be see­ing the media that objec­tify men. For exam­ple, I would not watch a “real­ity” show unless paid mil­lions of dol­lars per episode. I like to eat, not barf, while I watch TV

    I also may not under­stand what is meant by “objec­ti­fied.” And it’s also pos­si­ble that what’s hap­pen­ing now is that women got so fed up with being objec­ti­fied, and because it’s become polit­i­cally incor­rect to objec­tify women, we’re all objec­ti­fy­ing men instead.

    I also won­der if part of this is a resur­gence of the idea that women are sex­ual beings. That phase Mark S. refers to, from the Vic­to­rian era into the twen­ti­eth cen­tury, when men were not viewed in a sex­ual way, coin­cided with an anom­aly in the cul­tural per­cep­tion of women. Before that time, women were seen as dan­ger­ously sex­ual beings that men had to be pro­tected from (or pro­tect them­selves from). Then in the mid to late 18th cen­tury, women were seen as pure, hav­ing to be pro­tected from men and their preda­tory sexuality.

    Well, that’s over. But it could be that the con­flu­ence of these trends, along with the increas­ing recog­ni­tion and accep­tance of male homo­sex­u­al­ity, is lead­ing to a return of the view of men as the desired “object.” Women *and* men are now openly objec­ti­fy­ing men and not hav­ing to hide their interest.

  • I’m really sorry. Did I give the impres­sion that I felt a need to jus­tify my lack of empa­thy? That is so not what I meant.”

    No wor­ries.

    And do you really believe that women are *not* more objec­ti­fied than men? ”

    Men are a thou­sand times more objec­ti­fied than women and have always been. The male body is exposed and exploited for the pur­pose of sat­is­fy­ing audi­ences’ thirst for tit­il­la­tion, humil­i­a­tion and vio­lence orders of mag­ni­tude more than women’s bod­ies. I can’t even fathom how some­one can see greater objec­ti­fi­ca­tion of women. What media are you watching?

  • tu quoque: “Keep pre­tend­ing that women are more objec­ti­fied than men in order to jus­tify your lack of empathy.”

    I’m really sorry. Did I give the impres­sion that I felt a need to jus­tify my lack of empa­thy? That is so not what I meant.

    I’m self­ish, self-involved, cold, non-empathetic and gen­er­ally not a nice per­son. Although occa­sion­ally, like most peo­ple, I slip up. Some­times I do care about another per­son, but rarely about groups.

    And do you really believe that women are *not* more objec­ti­fied than men? Really? Is it pos­si­ble that because now men are being objec­ti­fied too, in con­trast to when only women were, it feels mon­u­men­tally hor­rific to some men to expe­ri­ence what women have been expe­ri­enc­ing for … a long time?

    To Mark S.: I haven’t had the impres­sion from your posts that you’re look­ing for empa­thy or sym­pa­thy about men’s objec­ti­fi­ca­tion, but just point­ing out what’s going on these days. If I’m wrong, I apol­o­gize to you. I’m not offer­ing empa­thy, just apol­o­giz­ing for not doing a bet­ter job of read­ing com­pre­hen­sion with my absolute favorite blog.

    And about how it all feels very Right Now!: well, yes, of course it is. But I still don’t think it means men’s nar­cis­sism only began with videos and YouTube. It’s like human vio­lence. Invent­ing machine guns and nukes and RPGs and what­not didn’t sud­denly make human beings vio­lent. It just gave us more ways to be vio­lent on a much grander scale. But we’ve been vio­lent from the begin­ning (and earlier–see chim­panzees and hunting).

  • And until men have to wear eye shadow and mas­cara and lip­stick at the office every day to be taken seri­ously, I’m not cry­ing over their objectification.”

    That’s it. Keep pre­tend­ing that women are more objec­ti­fied than men in order to jus­tify your lack of empathy.

    It must be nice to so eas­ily assuage any feel­ings of emo­tional responsibility.

  • Oooh, I’m sure I would love your china, Mark. But of course, I doubt you’d be inter­ested in show­ing it to me.

    And I think most of this stuff is naff. Although as a Yank, I’m not sure I know what that is.

    Back in the late 70s, my gay boyfriend would say that tack could some­times be accept­able, but not sleaze.

    What I like about Restora­tion com­edy and mod­ern com­edy is that women don’t have to pre­tend to be “pure.” Yes, all the self-referential oiled-up naked guys get kind of bor­ing after a while (some­times I’d rather be read­ing Jane Austen) but it’s bet­ter than the alternative.

    And until men have to wear eye shadow and mas­cara and lip­stick at the office every day to be taken seri­ously, I’m not cry­ing over their objectification.

  • I love Restora­tion Com­edy. And I’m sure you’d love my china, Ann. Like most men, I spend hours admir­ing it myself. When I’m not stroking my thighs in tights.

    Yes, males have been nar­cis­sists for most of his­tory, or at least youths of the (teen) age of Nar­cis­sus tended to be. Though from the Vic­to­ri­ans up to the later part of the Twen­ti­eth Cen­tury they were meant to stay in the closet about it. Vanity’s name was sup­posed to be Woman. I know, I know, it seems laugh­able now, but only a decade or so ago it was still con­sid­ered gospel.

    I don’t think rugger-bugger Hen­son, who is nearly 30, and his sub­mis­sive, shy smile and sensuous-sensational body ooz­ing with prod­uct — and total devo­tion to the cam­era — are time­less. It screams, impa­tiently, NOW!. Which is per­haps why it’s also just a lit­tle bit naff.

    (Do you for­give me for say­ing that, Gavin? I’ll still hap­pily help you with your exfo­li­a­tion regime and fake tan application.)

  • The woman pulling her nut sack out scared the crap out of me.

    But in a good way, I guess. It made me laugh.

    Mark, I can’t help think­ing we really have been here before. I know the new con­cept is mar­ket­ing, com­mod­i­fi­ca­tion, etc., but women have been “objec­ti­fy­ing” men for centuries.

    I do agree with you though that the biggest change is men’s self-involvement. But it might not be so dif­fer­ent: in the past, being “hot” was a way to attract pow­er­ful peo­ple, men and women, who could enable a man’s rise to power. Today, it’s not one indi­vid­ual so much as “star­dom,” which is the prod­uct of videos, which are all about look­ing into the camera/mirror and turn­ing one­self on. The tech­nol­ogy and the social struc­ture have changed, but men have always been narcissists.

    I enjoyed watch­ing the men in the breast can­cer ad, but it was the humor that did it for me. Sex by itself is bor­ing. But sex and com­edy? Irre­sistible. Restora­tion com­edy proved it three hun­dred years ago.

    One woman’s biased opinion.

    Please keep telling it like it is, Mark. You’re the only one.

  • He didn’t use too many of them him­self in the show. He let his orange tits do the talking.

  • This was all very inter­est­ing, but I’m afraid the scary orange man with the pant­ing dog in front of his man-parts has taken all my words away.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *